Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 072
Original file (2012 072.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DRB DOCKET 2012-072

 

[NAME EG

CURRENT DD-214 Honorable, COMDTINST M1000.6A, 12.B.11, JBK, Completion of Required
Active Service, RE4

RELIEF REQUESTED | REI |

RELIEF GRANTED SPD code: KN

BY DRB Narrative Reason: Separation for Miscellaneous/General Reasons
RE code: RE-3H

Separation Authority: COMDTINST M1000.6A, Article 12.B.12

ADMIN None
CORRECTIONS — _ —_ :

 

 

 

TIS 12 yrs, 3 months, 4 days
Policy Implications None

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The applicant was separated in lieu of orders (SILO) in early 2010. This was the result of a voluntary SILO
request made in 2009, by the applicant, due to an overwhelming financial situation in which relocation would
have adversely affected their family. In the Fall of 2009, just 8 weeks prior to his request to SILO, the applicant
was taken to Summary Court-Martial (SCM) for an inappropriate relationship onboard a USGC cutter. As a
Chief Petty Officer (CPO), and married at the time, the applicant fraternized with a third class petty officer in a
romantic relationship. These events occurred onboard the vessel in 2008 and 2009. Physical evidence (in the

form of pictures) was passed to the command showing the applicant and the PO3 embracing each other
intimately in a CPO stateroom onboard the vessel.

At the SCM proceedings, the applicant willingly admitted to the charges of an Inappropriate Relationship and
Adultery, Articles 92 and 134. The applicant was reduced from E7 to E6, received 45 days restriction, and lost
$2010 (2/3 of one month’s pay). With regard to the Discharge, the applicant received an SPD code of JBK,
which reads as an ‘involuntary’ separation upon completion of required service (no board entitlement). The
DD-214 was issued with an Honorable Discharge and an RE-4 reenlistment code. At the time of the
‘voluntary’ SILO request, the applicant had 3 years and 2 months remaining on the current enlistment.

The applicant submitted a request to SILO, to PSC-EPM, two weeks following receipt of PCS orders. The
primary reason for separating was to maintain financial stability for the children. Relocating from one coast to
the other coast would cause extreme financial distress on the family. The applicant stated that to be told that
approval of the SILO request was contingent upon accepting an RE-4 reenlistment code, which would bar the
applicant from future military service. The board recommends that applicant’s SPD code be changed to KND
with the narrative reason as: ‘Separation for Miscellaneous/General Reasons’. This change is consistent with
the SPD code normally issued by PSC-EPM for approved SILO requests. Pursuant to ALCOAST 125/10, the
use of SPD code KND allows a reentry code of RE-1, RE-3 or RE-4. Given the hardship indicated by the
applicant, and the SCM punishment, the board recommends an RE-3 reenlistment code with a disqualifying
factor for ‘hardship’ (RE-3H).

Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: Partial relief granted on the
following items:

SPD code: KND Narrative Reason: Separation for Miscellaneous/General Reasons

RE code: RE-3H Separation Authority: COMDTINST M1000.6A, Article 12.B.12

Similar Decisions

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 009

    Original file (2014 009.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant received an RE-4 code that bars her from future reentry into military service. A recommendation of an RE-3H is the appropriate reenlistment code to indicate that her request to voluntary separate was due to family hardship. An RE3 reentry code is not an affirmative recommendation for reenlistment, rather it represents that the applicant is not recommended for reenlistment due to a disqualifying factor.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 050

    Original file (2013 050.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-050 NAME CURRENT DD-214 Honorable, COMDTINST M1000.6A, Article 12.B.16, JFX, Personality Disorder, RE4 RELIEF REQUESTED | Upgrade RE code RELIEF GRANTED SPD code: JND Narrative Reason: Separation for Miscellaneous/General Reasons BY DRB RE code: RE-3H Separation Authority: COMDTINST M1000.4, Article 1.B.12 (legacy Personnel Manual 12.B.12) ADMIN None CORRECTIONS TIS 7 yrs, 6 months, 12 days Policy Implications None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant...

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2011-074

    Original file (2011-074.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The orders state that his separation code should be MBK. of the Personnel Manual and that in accordance with Article 12.F.6., members separating temporarily receive the KND separation code and “Separation for Miscellaneous/General Reasons” as their narrative reason for separation. The DRB also alleged that “MBK is not applicable as the applicant had remain- ing obligated service at the time of separation.” The DRB claimed that “the assignment of a code that reflects completion of required...

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 055

    Original file (2013 055.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The following provides an outline of the approval process and the notable findings: Applicant’s command: Made separation notification after just 3 months on performance probation. The current application requests to remove the Narrative Reason (NR) as ‘Unacceptable Conduct’, and to amend it to a Voluntary Separation that is in alignment with SPD code KND with an NR of Separation for Miscellaneous/General Reasons. EPM separation approval (summary): In the summer of 2013, the Discharge was...

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 051

    Original file (2013 051.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SECCEN followed up in late 2006 to indicate that no improvement had been made to eliminate the sizable debt that the applicant had created over a significant amount of time. Additionally, the command formally counseled applicant on the need to change their rating for retention in the service. Discharge: No change | 25.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 027

    Original file (2013 027.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Majority board recommends partial relief on the applicant’s Character of Service, based on the post-policy issued in ALCOAST 562/08. And, ALCOAST 254/05 on May 12, 2005 stated the following: “The Coast Guard may resume Anthrax vaccinations for personnel assigned to designated commands but only under the condition that personnel scheduled to receive the Anthrax vaccination may ACCEPT or REFUSE the vaccination. Board Conclusion: The Majority Board (3-2) recommends no relief to the...

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 004

    Original file (2013 004.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After receiving five negative 3307s, the applicant was officially placed on performance probation after six months as a crewmember. The SPD code JNC should remain intact; however, the narrative reason for separation on the DD-214 is incorrect. In accordance with the SPD Handbook, the narrative reason for SPD code JNC is “Unacceptable Conduct.” The Board recommends an administrative change from “General Misconduct” to “Unacceptable Conduct.’” Additionally, the Board recommends that the...

  • CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 043

    Original file (2012 043.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pursuant to Article 4.B.1 of the Reserve Policy Manual, COMDTINST M1001.28A, commands are required to “monitor member participation” and “Correct performance deficiencies by timely counseling of members who are not participating satisfactorily. Commands shall document all counseling in accordance with Preparation and Submission of Administrative Remarks (CG-3307).” There is no record of the command complying with these requirements prior to recommiending the applicant for discharge. ...

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 073

    Original file (2013 073.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After receiving two documented alcohol incidents in the Fall of 2004, an administrative remarks entry was documented in which the applicant refused to attend outpatient rehabilitation treatment for Level II Alcohol Abuse. Discharge | No Change 25. Narrative Reason | No Change

  • CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 051

    Original file (2012 051.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Commands shall document all counseling in accordance with Preparation and Submission of Administrative Remarks (CG-3307).” There is no record of the command complying with these requirements prior to recommending the applicant for discharge. Additionally, the absence of a discharge package and supporting documentation regarding notification of the intent to discharge and appropriate due process being followed is problematic. Therefore, the Board recommends that the applicant’s record be...